Strategy, Innovation & Leadership

Thinking Directions Framework

By Ron Meyer | January 9, 2023 | 3 min read
Which thinking methods can I use to explore issues and potential solutions? Ron Meyer presents an insightful tool to kickstart your thinking: Thinking Directions Framework.

Key Definitions

People think all day, but they seldom think about how they think. In practice, people follow certain thinking routines to which they have become accustomed, often taking mental shortcuts (called cognitive heuristics) to make life easier. Yet, such habits of the mind limit and color what people see. This makes everyone susceptible to cognitive biases.

As alternative to such “quick and dirty” judgement, you can also use more “slow and thorough” thinking methods. These structured approaches to thinking discipline you to follow a certain line of inquiry, aiding you to explore issues and potential solutions more meticulously.

Conceptual Model

The Thinking Directions framework outlines five complementary thinking methods that are applicable to every challenging issue, in business or elsewhere. Each of the thinking methods points the exploration into a certain direction, to ensure that an issue and/or solution are looked at from all angles. No examination is complete until all five have been used.

Thinking Directions Framework

Download picture

Key Elements

The five thinking directions are the following: 
1. Drill Down. The best question to kick off the deeper examination of an issue is “what?” – what is going on, what is the issue, what are the parts of the issue and what is the issue behind the issue? Drilling down starts with delineating the issue (what is the scope?), followed by mapping the variables involved and identifying their relationships (what is the structure?). The objective is to dig deep enough to understand the issue’s complexity.
2. Zoom Out. A valuable follow-up question is “why?” – why is this happening, why is this an issue and/or why is the proposed solution fitting? Zooming out is about taking a step back to be able to see the bigger picture – to see the forest, not only the trees. The objective is to gain enough overview to understand in what way the issue is influenced by the broader context and how it in turn can/will have an impact on other issues.
3. Zoom In. Thinking in the opposite direction leads to the questions “who”, “how”, “where”, and “when” – who is involved, how does it work, where is it felt and when are actions expected? Zooming in is about taking a step forward to be able to see the detailed picture – to see the leaves on each of the trees. The objective is to gain a fine-grained insight into the situation and to thoroughly understand how any solution might play out in practice.
4. Diverge. A fourth thinking direction is to ask the question “what else?” – what else might be going on, what else can explain the situation and what else might be a solution? Diverging is about looking further than the likely suspects, by considering alternative explanations or paths forward. The objective is to avoid jumping to conclusions by always searching for a number of different ways of understanding and/or acting.
5. Converge. After asking all of the other questions, it is essential to also ask “what then?” – what then is the issue, what then is the advice, what then is the decision? Converging is about evaluating the various options and arriving at a conclusion. The objective is to avoid ongoing paralysis-by-analysis by weighing the alternatives already on the table with the intention of coming to a definitive result.

Key Insights

• Thinking is colored by cognitive biases. Every person sees the world through their own lens. This mental map shapes what you observe and how you make sense of these observations. This biased view of reality can be reenforced if other group members share the same assumptions (called the dominant logic or in extreme cases groupthink).
• Thinking is steered by cognitive heuristics. People are not only biased but also tend to cut corners when thinking by using quick and dirty reasoning methods. Such cognitive heuristics include assuming that things are simple, that they can be understood in isolation and that old explanations and solutions can be used again.
• Thinking can be enriched by thinking methods. To circumvent cognitive biases and heuristics as best as possible, people can use more slow and thorough thinking methods that discipline the user to ask a number of questions and go through various thinking steps more consciously. Doing this with a diverse group of people is even better.
• There are five universal thinking methods. Under all circumstances people’s reasoning can be improved by thinking in five directions: Drilling down, to understand the issue structure; zooming out, to understand the bigger picture; zooming in, to understand the specific details; diverging, to understand the potential alternatives; and converging, to understand what the conclusions could be.
• Effective managers use all five thinking methods. The five thinking directions are complementary and should be used by managers for all non-routine issues to ensure they don’t “jump to solutions”. The five sets of questions can be seen as a type of checklist to help managers look at issues from all angles. However, while each thinking direction is conceptually easy to understand, having the discipline to consistently employ them is hard. 

Inspired by this Kickstart?

During the six-day Masterclass Organizational Leadership you will work on solutions for a problem of your own definition, such as transforming with your organization and getting employees moving. You will also reflect on the performance of your Management Team and your organization. This will help you realize effective growth for your organization.

Read more about the Masterclass Organizational Leadership »

Corporate Management Styles is part 43 of a series of management models by prof. dr. Ron Meyer. Ron is managing director of the Center for Strategy & Leadership and publishes regularly on Center for Strategy & Leadership.
Related articles