Leadership is not the same as authority
A defining moment in Olonisakin’s thinking came during her time at the United Nations. From inside the system, she observed how decisions were made, often far removed from the people affected by them.
“People who occupied positions of authority were not actually influential… they were not speaking for the vast majority of people they were meant to represent.”
This distinction between authority and leadership is central to her work. Holding a position does not mean you are influencing outcomes in meaningful ways. Leadership, she argues, is about shaping change in complex and uncertain situations, not simply exercising power.

Preparing for leadership starts with thinking differently
This leads Roemer to a fundamental question: can leadership even be developed? Olonisakin is cautious. Leadership, she argues, cannot be reduced to a set of predictable actions that guarantee success in complex, real-world situations.
Instead, preparation takes a different form: “Preparation is about how we think, how we seek to understand our environment and society, and how we build relationships.”
This shifts the focus away from predefined skills toward how leaders make sense of the world around them. Leadership development becomes less about training individuals to perform and more about enabling them to engage with complexity and uncertainty.
No relationship, no leadership
At the heart of Olonisakin’s perspective lies a simple but far-reaching idea: leadership depends on relationships. “Your success depends on the quality of relationships you build.”
In structured organizations, hierarchy and formal roles can sometimes create the illusion of leadership. Tasks are assigned, targets are met, and authority appears to be enough to get things done. But as Olonisakin suggests, this is not the same as leadership.
Especially in more complex or societal contexts, leadership cannot be imposed from the top down. It emerges through trust, connection, and shared understanding, and through the ability to engage others in addressing common challenges. Without those relationships, influence remains shallow. With them, leadership becomes something that is co-created rather than controlled.
Ubuntu: “I am because you are”
The concept of Ubuntu captures this alternative way of thinking. “You cannot exist, you do not exist without the other… I am because you are.” Ubuntu emphasizes that individuals are inseparable from the communities they belong to. Identity, success, and even possibility itself are shaped through others. In that sense, leadership is never an individual achievement, but always embedded in a network of relationships, responsibilities, and mutual dependence.
This perspective challenges the idea of the self-made leader. It suggests instead that leadership carries an obligation to recognize and respond to the broader community, and that success is measured not only by what one achieves, but also by how that success contributes to others.
Rethinking success and value
This perspective also reframes what success looks like. In many Western contexts, leadership is associated with individual achievement, visibility, and measurable results. But Olonisakin challenges this narrow view: “Your success may also create insecurities for others around you.”
Rather than focusing only on outcomes, she shifts attention to consequences. Leadership is not just about what is achieved, but about how that achievement affects others. Value, in this sense, extends beyond organizations or shareholders to the broader society in which leadership is exercised.
Leadership only makes sense in context
At this point in the conversation, Roemer and ‘Funmi Olonisakin arrive at a key insight: leadership cannot be understood in abstraction.
“Without experiencing leadership in context, you cannot do right by those people when you're making important decisions.”
Understanding leadership requires engagement with real situations and lived experiences. Theory can offer guidance, but it cannot replace the insights that come from being close to the people and environments leadership is meant to serve.
Leadership as a shared responsibility
Taken together, these ideas point to a broader shift in how leadership is understood. Leadership is not confined to individuals or positions, but unfolds in interaction with others and within specific contexts.
Ubuntu expresses this in its simplest form. It reminds us that leadership is always relational and that its impact reaches beyond the individual. In that sense, leadership becomes less about personal success and more about contributing to something shared.