:quality(90))
:quality(90))
Many AI projects deliver disappointing results, not because the technology fails, but because the problem is formulated incorrectly. Organizations ask for a classification model when they actually need a ranking, or they attempt optimization using a simple classification model. This isn’t a subtle nuance; it’s a fundamental mistake that undermines the effectiveness of AI.
This article explains what classification, ranking, and optimization really mean, why they are often confused, and which practical recommendations organizations can follow to make the right choice.
Classification
In classification, AI assigns items to categories: yes/no, high/low, fraudulent/not fraudulent.
Strength: works well when clear labels exist and a discrete decision is required.
Example: a model that determines whether a transaction is fraudulent.
Risk: when reality is more complex than a binary label, classification becomes too rigid.
Recommendations:
Use classification only when clear, unambiguous labels exist.
Ensure a balanced dataset where all categories are sufficiently represented.
Communicate clearly that classification produces hard decisions; errors feel direct and binary.
Discover the Masterclass AI & Strategy for Executives by Jeroen De Flander at TIAS Business School. In this three-day program, you’ll learn how AI strengthens strategic thinking, accelerates decision-making, and helps move AI from experimentation to structural impact. Not a technical course, but a strategic deep dive for executives who want to shape the direction of AI.
Ranking
In ranking, AI orders items: who to call first, which cases get priority, which leads deserve attention.
Strength: more robust in practice because errors are less binary.
Common mistake: ranking is often disguised as classification (“top 10% leads”).
Example: a model that ranks all leads by likelihood of conversion so sales can prioritize the highest ones.
Recommendations:
Choose ranking when prioritization matters more than a hard yes/no decision.
Avoid reducing rankings to classifications (“top 10%”), as this removes nuance.
Explain to users that ranking is a prioritization tool, not an absolute decision.
Optimization
In optimization, AI searches for the best allocation or combination: planning, pricing, resource distribution.
Strength: produces decisions that consider multiple constraints and objectives.
Requirement: explicit and consistent goals.
Common mistake: organizations define vague or conflicting objectives, making meaningful outcomes impossible.
Example: a model that allocates production capacity across factories to minimize costs and reduce lead times.
Recommendations:
Use optimization only when goals are clear and measurable.
Define constraints explicitly (budget, capacity, regulations).
Test scenarios in advance to identify and resolve conflicting objectives.
Ensure the business understands that optimization produces a calculated “best solution,” not a prediction.
Typical practical mistakes
Building a classification model when the business only needs a ranking
Attempting optimization without defining what “better” actually means
Interpreting rankings as hard decisions, even though they are meant for prioritization
Why this matters
The type of AI problem determines:
Which model makes sense: classification, ranking, or optimization.
How errors are experienced: binary and harsh in classification, gradual in ranking, or strategic in optimization.
Whether users trust the system: choosing the wrong model leads to frustration and distrust, even if the technology itself works correctly.
Many AI projects fail not because the model is poor, but because the problem was formulated incorrectly. The distinction between classification, ranking, and optimization is not theoretical, it’s a practical prerequisite for success. Organizations that make this distinction systematically and follow the right recommendations significantly increase the likelihood that their AI projects create real value.
Want to discover how AI can strengthen your role as a leader?
Explore it in our AI & Strategy for Executives Masterclass. Interested? Contact Wendy van Haaren for more information.