Many organizations talk about AI as if it’s just one button: you buy a model, connect the data, done. In reality, “predictive AI” is a chain of decisions that follow one another. If one link is missing, you end up with either a model that is never used or a solution that looks smart on paper but causes problems in practice.

This is not a technical step-by-step guide, but 5 questions:

Step 1: Clarify the decision (what do we want to improve?)

AI doesn’t start with data; it starts with a decision. Which choice do you want to make faster, more consistently, or with less risk? “We want to do something with churn” is not a decision. “We want to decide, for each customer, who receives a proactive offer and who does not.” is a decision.

In this phase, you also explicitly define what “better” means: speed, cost, quality, safety, customer satisfaction, or compliance. Without that goal, you’ll later have debates about success you can never win.

What goes wrong if you skip this phase: you build a model that provides interesting insights but has no owner. Everyone finds it “fascinating,” but nobody changes their behavior.

Step 2: Define the pattern (what signal are we looking for?)

A decision improves if you can recognize a pattern that people currently miss. Predictive AI is about detecting a signal that makes something likely. That signal can be a combination of events, text, transactions, sensor data, or context.

The discipline here is to formulate the pattern in a way that is measurable. “Dissatisfied customers” is too vague. “Customers at high risk of leaving within 30 days” is concrete. You also define the horizon: 7 days, 30 days, or 12 months. This choice determines everything: data quality, interventions, and business value.

Common challenges: teams choose a pattern that sounds logical but isn’t stable. The signal changes, the model drifts, and nobody trusts the output.

Want to learn how AI can enhance your strategic thinking as an executive? Discover the AI & Strategy for Executives Masterclass by Jeroen De Flander at TIAS Business School. In this three-day program, you’ll learn how AI can become a lever for smarter analyses, faster decision-making, and more effective strategy execution. Not a technical course, but a strategic exploration for those who truly want to make an impact.

Step 3: Determine the data (which inputs do we need?)

Only now does data come into play. Not: “as much as possible,” but exactly enough to support the pattern. You decide which sources are needed, which timestamps are correct, which definitions are consistent across the organization, and which missing values are acceptable.

A key management point: data quality is rarely an IT problem; it’s ownership. Who “owns” the definition of customer, order, incident, failure, or patient contact? If these definitions differ by department, predictive AI is inherently political.

Common challenges: organizations underestimate integration. They have data, but not at the granularity or speed required for the decision moment. Or they have data, but no permission to use it.

Step 4: Choose the AI capability (which technique fits the risk and context?)

At this stage, you don’t choose “the best model,” but the right level of complexity. Sometimes a simple baseline is better: easier to explain, easier to monitor, and often strong enough. Sometimes complexity is required (for example, with images, audio, or highly non-linear patterns).

More important than the technique is calibration and explainability: can a user understand why the system makes a recommendation, and can you set thresholds that match the risk? In high-risk situations, you may want a model that is less “smart” but more predictable and controllable.

Common challenges: people optimize for a ccuracy on a test set but forget decision impact. A model that performs 2% better but is never used is 100% waste.

Step 5: Embed in work (how does it become routine?)

This is the phase that makes the difference between a demo and real value. Predictive AI must appear at the moment people make decisions, in the system where they work, with clear action options.

There must be an owner, a feedback loop, and monitoring: what do people do with the recommendation, what are the errors, when does the system stop, and when is it retrained? Governance also belongs here: who can override, who intervenes in case of deviations, and how do you demonstrate afterward that it was done responsibly?

Common challenges: AI is “offered” in a separate dashboard. The team says it is “available.” In practice, nobody looks because there is no rhythm, mandate, or consequence.

The three most common misconceptions

“We start with data and see what comes out.” That is exploration, not predictive AI with impact.
“If the model is good, adoption will follow automatically.” Adoption is a design question, not a statistic.
“We’re only advanced when we make decisions autonomously.” Most value lies in better decisions, not in deciding without humans.

The diagnostic question that always works

If you don’t know where you stand, ask one question:
“Which of the five questions is our bottleneck today?”

Not where you are busiest, but where the initiative is truly blocked. If you answer honestly, the next step becomes clear. Predictive AI is not a leap; it’s five explicit, good choices.

A short example to feel the difference

Suppose you want to predict maintenance.

Step 1 is not “predictive maintenance,” but: “Do we intervene preventively today, or wait for a failure?”
Step 2 is the pattern: which combination of vibrations, temperature, error codes, and usage hours indicates failure within 14 days?
Step 3 is data: are those sensors aligned and do we have enough historical failures?
Step 4 is capability: is a simple score enough, or is a complex model needed?
Step 5 is embedding: who receives the alert, what action follows, and what happens if the recommendation is ignored?

In short:

Decision: which choice changes work tomorrow?
Pattern: how do you define “high risk” and within which timeframe?
Data: which three variables must be reliable?
Capability: which error is more dangerous—false positive or false negative?
Embedding: where and how does this become routine?

Want to discover how AI can strengthen your role as a leader?
Explore it in our AI & Strategy for Executives Masterclass. Interested? Contact Wendy van Haaren for more information.

5 Steps to effective AI use